skip to main content


Vol.7, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 167-186 Full text

Crossmark logo

Web of Science: 000737013000003

Mayowa Akinlotan

Affiliation: Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Germany

The choice between since and because allows language users to provide rationality which is part of the cognitive functions of language. Different conditions have been shown to explicate this alternation, with little attention paid to the clausal weight. The present paper shows how expression of rationality is alternated between choosing a since or because, since both have the semantic capacity to do so, in certain contexts. The study uses a simple measurement method to show the extent to which clausal weight relates to this alternation. Relying on corpus data from a well-known variety representing Nigerian English, the present study shows that the choice between since and because is related to a number of factors such as the type of text producing the usages. With 1074 usages showing such interchangeable usages extracted from academic and media text types in written Nigerian English, it is shown that, at least in the variety under examination, the choice of since over because as a rationality expresser is scarce, and that overall pattern can be predicted on the basis of certain contexts including clausal weight and ordering pattern. The scarcity of since as a rationality expresser is perhaps a reflection of interference from the local languages, which do not have semantic equivalents.

Keywords: since/because alternation, syntactic alternation, rationality clauses, clause structure, structural variability

Article history:
Submitted: 4 August 2021
Reviewed: 30 September 2021
Accepted: 30 November 2021
Published: 30 December 2021

Citation (APA):
Akinlotan, M. (2021). Since/Because Alternation: Insights from Clause Structures in Nigerian English. English Studies at NBU, 7(2), 167-186.

Copyright © 2021 Mayowa Akinlotan

This open access article is published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you want to use the work commercially, you must first get the authors' permission.

Akinlotan, M., & Housen, A. (2017). Noun phrase complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic function and length outweigh genre in predicting noun phrase complexity. English Today, 33(3), 31-38.

Akinlotan, M. (2018). The Structural Simplification Hypothesis and the Premodifiers in Nigerian English. Anglica An International Journal of English Studies, 27(2), 58-88.

Akinlotan, M. (2021). Calling a spade a shovel: a cognitive construction account of BE-relativisation. Studia Neophilologica.

Altenberg, B. (2008). Clausal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica. A Journal of General Linguistics, 38 (1), 20-69.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Kortmann, B. (2000). Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. De Gruyter.

Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge University Press.

Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2000). Usages with if, since, and because: 585 Causality, Epistemic stance and clause order. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Kortmann, B. (Eds.), Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (pp. 111-142). De Gruyter.

Diessel, H. (2001). The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study. Language, 77(3), 433-455.

Diessel, H. (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial 593 clauses. Linguistics, 43(3), 449-470.

Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 465-490.

Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2006). A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses. Language, 81(4), 882-906.

Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: A cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning and use. In Siemund, Peter (Ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, 23-54. De Gruyter.

Goldberg, A. (1995). Usages: A Usage Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.

Hawkins, J. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press.

Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press.

Hetterle, K. (2015). Adverbial Clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. De Gruyter.

Hoffmann, T. & Bergs, A. (2018). A Construction Grammar Approach to Genre. CogniTextes 18.

Kachru, B. (2019). 'World Englishes and Culture Wars.' In C. L. Nelson, Z. G. Proshina & D. R. Davis (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 447-471). Cambridge University Press.

Kanetani, M. (2005). Relations among Usages with Because: With Special Reference to Metalinguistic Uses of Because, Tsukuba English Studies, (24), 31-50.

Kanetani, M. (2006). Usages of Causation and Reasoning. Tsukuba English Studies, (25), 19-40.

Kanetani, M. (2007). Focalizations of Because and Since: Since-Clauses Can Be 622 Focalized by Certain Focusing Adverbs, Especially Since There Is No Reason to Ban It. English Linguistics, 24(2), 341-362.

Kanetani, M. (2019). Causation and Reasoning Usages. John Benjamins.

Nikiforidou, K. (2016). 'Genre knowledge' in a constructional framework: Lexis, grammar and perspective in folk tales. In N. Stukker, W. Spooren & G. Steen (Eds.), Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition (pp. 331-360). De Gruyter.

Rosenbach, A. (2005). Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language, 81(3), 613-644.


1. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons

2. Reviewer's name: Undisclosed
Review Content: Undisclosed
Review Verified on Publons

Handling Editor: Stan Bogdanov
Verified Editor Record on Publons

Article Metrics